Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Small instream infrastructure: Comparative methods and evidence of environmental and ecological responses

  • Stephanie R. Januchowski-Hartley
  • , Sukhmani Mantel
  • , Jorge Celi
  • , Virgilio Hermoso
  • , James C. White
  • , Scott Blankenship
  • , Julian D. Olden

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

1. Around the globe, instream infrastructures such as dams, weirs, and culverts associated with roads are wide-spread and continue to be constructed. There is limited documentation of smaller infrastructure because of mixed regulation and laws related to instream construction, as well as difficulty in documentation because of their size and frequency in waterscapes. 2. We reviewed evidence of different methods used to quantify environmental and ecological responses (positive, negative, or neutral) to dams, weirs, and culverts. 3. Most studies (78% of 87) in our review evaluated dams or weirs, and more than half evaluated environmental or ecological responses at more than one of these structures. More than half of the studies used spatial (disturbed–undisturbed in the same or a different catchment) rather than temporal (before–after construction or before–after destruction) comparative methods. Evaluations also tended to focus on ecological variables, most specifically on fish community responses (just over a quarter) to infrastructure. 4. More than half (58%) of the evaluations at dams, weirs, or culverts reported negative environmental or ecological responses. Discrepancies in responses recorded for different infrastructure types could be partially explained by the focus on ecological responses in reviewed studies and related metrics used for evaluations (e.g. biotic groups, richness, and abundance), the imbalance of studies at different infrastructure types, and discrepancies in spatial and temporal scales of evaluations compared to those at which the variables respond to infrastructure. 5. Despite the abundance of road culverts greatly exceeding the number of small or large dams worldwide, they were evaluated in only 22% of studies that we reviewed. Our findings underscore the need for studies to not only better understand local but also cumulative impacts of these smaller infrastructure, as these could be greater than those caused by large infrastructure depending on their location, density, and type, among other factors. Such studies are needed to inform infrastructure planning and watershed management.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12026
JournalEcological Solutions and Evidence
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Ecological Solutions and Evidence published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • dams
  • evaluation
  • freshwater ecosystems
  • rivers
  • roads
  • weirs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Small instream infrastructure: Comparative methods and evidence of environmental and ecological responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this