Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Groundwater governance: the illegality of exploitation and ways to minimize the problem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

In Brazil, there are about 2.5 million tubular wells in which 88% of them are illegal, extracting more than 17,580 Mm3/yr. This irregular use may cause sustainability issues that may be economic, social, or environmental (overexploitation, well losses and associated increases of water conflicts; aquifer contamination; and land subsidence). This paper aims to address the illegal wells in Brazil and discuss measures to minimize it. Conclusions indicate that users do not understand the aquifer dynamic and, therefore, do not have a proper understanding of problems such as loss of water quality and quantity caused by the excess of groundwater exploitation. This creates a false idea that there are no water conflicts among users, which causes a lack of engagement by society. Without groundwater users and stakeholder pressure, the government does not aim to control or close illegal wells, and the “vicious cycle” persists. The one way to break this “vicious cycle” would be programs of social communication and users’ participation, coupled with improvements to the control apparatus and inspection from State institutions, making sure that there is correct management and not only legislations that are not applied.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere20200623
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalAnais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
Volume93
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Academia Brasileira de Ciencias. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Illegal well
  • Participation
  • Stakeholder engagement
  • Sustainability
  • Water gov-ernance
  • Water resources

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Groundwater governance: the illegality of exploitation and ways to minimize the problem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this